The FDIC is also a non-appropriated agency. Robert, ignored! These are all themes irrelevant to the Conservatorship and the Charters of FnF, and it's a continuation of the conspiracy, with all the statutory provisions in the FHEFSSA and the Charter Act covered up by the corrupt plaintiffs. Like the Supreme Court declaring the FHFA director unconstitutional, when the removal restriction "for cause" is the necessary isolation for a director overseeing two congressionally-chartered private corporations (the 11 FHLBanks as well), that renders the director with LIMITED powers, complying with the Separation of Powers. The Supreme Court didn't strike the provision:
There is established the FHFA, which shall be an independent agency of the Federal government.
If you don't want the FHFA, you have to revoke the Charters.
What happened in the DC court appropriations decision that caused the split? Possible to post? I do not have access to pacer. Which decision reads better in your opinion? thanks