InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

navycmdr

01/16/23 7:31 PM

#744766 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #744765

yup ... that's gonna be a Booom !
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

stockanalyze

01/16/23 8:14 PM

#744767 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #744765

is that the same panel to review collins appeal that was filed with cfpb related amendment ?
icon url

Wise Man

01/17/23 2:32 AM

#744787 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #744765

The FDIC is also a non-appropriated agency. Robert, ignored!
These are all themes irrelevant to the Conservatorship and the Charters of FnF, and it's a continuation of the conspiracy, with all the statutory provisions in the FHEFSSA and the Charter Act covered up by the corrupt plaintiffs.
Like the Supreme Court declaring the FHFA director unconstitutional, when the removal restriction "for cause" is the necessary isolation for a director overseeing two congressionally-chartered private corporations (the 11 FHLBanks as well), that renders the director with LIMITED powers, complying with the Separation of Powers.
The Supreme Court didn't strike the provision:

There is established the FHFA, which shall be an independent agency of the Federal government.


If you don't want the FHFA, you have to revoke the Charters.
icon url

Next Wave

01/18/23 9:53 AM

#744943 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #744765

What happened in the DC court appropriations decision that caused the split? Possible to post? I do not have access to pacer. Which decision reads better in your opinion? thanks