Replies to post #743847 on Fannie Mae (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

I don't know about predicting the actual outcome of damages IF they agree to hear the Takings Case.

Can you cite one case where a federal government agency conservator (e.g., RTC or FDIC from the 80's) during a conservatorship of corporations has had to pay the fair market value of company stock on a given trading day?

Would the fact that Susan McFarland, the CFO of Fannie Mae informed the federal government in internal nonpublic meetings that the "golden years are ahead and the $50B DTA could be reversed", is relevant?

[Robert from yahoo bd]

Look we're all looking for the big game kill here and that's to reverse the 3rd Amendment Net Worth Sweep. The nondelegation doctrine seems to be the latest possible focus of attention with the Supremes. Last Summer, SCOTUS, WV v EPA was decided in an attempt to reign in the out of control actions of a federal agency through application of the major questions doctrine.

Have you or any other Shareholder considered challenging the NWS as a violation of the Major Questions Doctrine?

Here's some good reading on the Nondelegation Doctrine from Justice Gorsuch's opinion in WV v EPA: Footnote 6: "6 In the course of its argument, the dissent leans heavily on two recent
academic articles. Post, at 29. But if a battle of law reviews were the
order of the day, it might be worth adding to the reading list. See, e.g.,
I. Wurman, Nondelegation at the Founding, 130 Yale L. J. 1490, 1493–
1494 (2021); D. Candeub, Preference and Administrative Law, 72 Admin.
L. Rev. 607, 614–628 (2020); P. Hamburger, Delegation or Divesting?,
115 Nw. L. Rev. Online 88, 91–110 (2020); M. McConnell, The President
Who Would Not Be King 326–335 (2020); A. Gordon, Nondelegation, 12
N. Y. U. J. L. & Liberty 718, 719 (2019); R. Cass, Delegation Reconsid-
ered: A Delegation Doctrine for the Modern Administrative State, 40
Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol’y 147, 155–161 (2017); G. Lawson & G. Seidman,
“A Great Power of Attorney:” Understanding the Fiduciary Constitution
104–129 (2017); P. Hamburger, Is Administrative Law Unlawful? 377–
402 (2014); L. Alexander & S. Prakash, Reports of the Nondelegation
Doctrine’s Death are Greatly Exaggerated, 70 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1297,
1298–1299 (2003); G. Lawson, Delegation and Original Meaning, 88 Va.
L. Rev. 327, 335–343 (2002); D. Schoenbrod, The Delegation Doctrine:
Could the Court Give It Substance? 83 Mich. L. Rev. 1223, 1252–1255,
1260–1261 (1985); see generally P. Wallison & J. Yoo, The Administra-
tive State Before the Supreme Court: Perspectives on the Nondelegation
Doctrine (2022)."