If it was owned by HPNN, it would be an asset, and subject to seizure proceeding by those Petey is subject of UCC liens against HPNN. The UCC liens are the way California helps others recover assets, and any real asset owed by HPNN is/has been subject to seizure.
This is likely why it is listed as having an investment in digitalage, but not that it is a wholly-owned or even partially-owned subsidiary. Many investors know why HPNN purposely does not show any assets or much cash EVER in its coffers.
One could give Petey the benefit of the doubt, but his track record of serial fraud is well-documented by the courts. Good luck - hopefully many were able to dump HPNN for a profit or have liquidated to reduce their losses. Still some probably are hoping for a hype-induced rally where he may attract a few gullible investors to buy the shares most others would like to dump at a little higher price.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
