InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

gitreal

12/02/22 9:25 PM

#85604 RE: alidare #85602

Could the note holder be “friendly”?

No. I can't believe anybody would still ask this question. 2 billion shares and a 95% drop in share price. Sheez.......
icon url

swingingRichard

12/03/22 10:40 AM

#85608 RE: alidare #85602

That “history” is lie after lie from the company that has lied. PRs are not a “history” of anything more than “they SAID” it means nothing.
icon url

condor1

12/03/22 11:34 AM

#85609 RE: alidare #85602

Alidare, much as I pray that we/I don not lose my investment, and further, I make a bunch of money, just like you, in your justifiable presumptions of the essential nature of the arrangement with the lender, I am not nearly so confident as you regarding the lender and the shareholders being on the same side of this company.

For one, you rely on the fact that your reliance and trust of AABB/ your investment, is rooted in part on the fact that the CEO and the BOD invested $2.8 million(2.4 mil by the CEO). The PR says so. That is the source of your undeniable trust and belief.

On the other hand, I, for one, know darn well that 1) PRs are issued for the benefit of the company, not the shareholders. How did the company benefit from that PR? You ask. AABB benefitted by demonstrating that the CEO and the BOD have invested their own money, just like us. This, in turn, bolstered the trust and belief from the shareholders, "WE ARE IN THIS TOGETHER. 2) But did the CEO and BOD invest out of their own pockets, IN CASH? Or, did the BOD and the CEO invest their own pay, that they provide to themselves, in the form of salary and bonuses, and meeting attendance? Do we know what was the source of that investment? Do we know the meeting fees? Do we know the CEO's salary and bonus package? Do we know what the finacnial benefits that the BOD has awarded to the CEO?

You rely on that investment by the CEO and the BOD, as assurance that they are standing with us, and at $.10 a share. So, you are confident that there could not possibly be a downside to this scenario. BUT, do you refuse to consider that the subject PR was issued for AABB benefit, and why?

TOPIC TWO

If the lender owns 80-90 % of the shares when gold MIGHT be struck, doesn't the lender get 80-90% of the profits, and we , the shareholders who are paying for the AABB ride, get only 10-20%?

Will we get yet another 500 milllion share increase in 6 more months, followed by another? All the while, the lender is getting serious purchase prices, for lending AABB ...... NOTHING?

And , why do you believe that AABB refuses to disclose the entirety of the nature of the lender, the relationship with the lender, the unexplained and undisclosed facts that require AABB to retain the lender, the lender's seemingly toxic arrangement?

Friendly? Per Benny? Can we truly trust Benny? What is his agenda, TRULY? He answers only questions that he chooses to answer, and only in a way that he chooses to answer them.

All the forward looking and rich future PRs will not mean much , even if gold is dscovered, if the lender gets all the spoils, along with the CEO and BOD as a secondary beneficiary.

TOPIC THREE

All the Guerrero history is not important, It is the past, and AABB apparently has $60 million dollars, regardless of where it came from, be it the Guerrero mine, the lender, the drug cartels, or Santa Claus. It is the past, and irrelevant for the shareholders. Who cares what the negative spin is.