InvestorsHub Logo

LuLeVan

11/23/22 6:23 AM

#740913 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #740909

It's mean, even though it doesn't lack a certain legal logic*.

*Judge Ellison wrote: "Their new Appropriations Clause claims exceed the scope of the remand."

clarencebeaks21

11/23/22 9:17 AM

#740917 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #740909

Robert, I think Ellison is mistaken when he characterizes the intervening authority on the Appropriations claims (counts II & IV) as Collins v Yellen at SCOTUS. Rather, I the intervening authority was the recent CFPB case. So IMO, Ps can appeal that as an error.