Replies to post #58026 on Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFT)

[marcis]

LOL didn’t they determine they didn’t here in Calasse case SC ruling
Or what ?

[Yolo]

He's saying that the order to show cause identified a jurisdictional defect and "think about what that means."

The eternal optimist will think "perfect! It means Calasse lacks standing to appeal, it's over!"

The realist will think "why would he lack standing to appeal when the canceled shares were registered to him... Maybe the jurisdictional defect goes much deeper, which is a bad thing."

"Jurisdiction" has many meanings. Personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, general and limited jurisdiction. In this case, the question is "does the court have jurisdiction (authority) to cancel shares of someone who wasn't under jurisdiction of the court?"

[I-Glow]

States have to follow decisions of the US Supreme Court, a Federal Court either District or Circuit (Appellate) - the decisions in Federal Court are binding in State Courts.

So, the Nevada Supreme Court can't ignore the Federal rulings.

It looks like Sharp might get that A$$ beat on again.

I doubt Sharp gave Calasse proper notification of the custodianship - Sharp has already lost two shell hijackings because of failure to notify.

IG