Replies to post #739906 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[stockprofitter]

Agree. How can you have a fair, open, transparent trial to discover the facts when only a portion of the evidence is permissible?

It’s like putting a murderer on trial who has committed murder with a handgun but the shells found at the crime scene are not permissible.

If ya wanna find out the truth then all material must be allowed to be submitted in court whether a jury or not.

[Achilles deFlandres]

Hopefully SCOTUS will grant the request for Writ of Certiorari.

In terms of Lamberth doing a disservice the jury is still out. He does what he must as he sees fit. There were reasons for for his actions. As an example, It seemed a disservice when all the takings cases were dismissed; there was a reason. I was appalled when the explanation for the takings dismissals was given: that the plaintiffs cannot exclude the government...but the government has most definitely excluded the shareholders. In any case Judges must rule according to their authority, jurisdiction and the statute.

Only SCOTUS can provide final, unassailable weasel words in the GSE saga. An example of that was the Collins clarification/re-definition of "independent" after 14yrs of this beee esss......