InvestorsHub Logo

trding

11/02/22 8:58 AM

#215275 RE: 3X Charm #215270

We will see. I think you underestimate him. He won the 2001 Indian Arts craft case because he was "technically correct". He did have a Native American on staff. They had to drop the case. The direct quote they complained about I believe was technically correct... just saying. I read this case back in 2017, and after that I followed his words closely. He always worded stuff that was technically correct from when I followed it. Did you leave out the p-value for he overall trial didn't meet statistical significance. Yes, he always left out the bad news. I use to say NP doesn't like giving bad news. But the good news was always correctly worded in my opinion.

His argument

"Is it sufficient that a member of an Indian tribe design and supervise the production? Does the participation of any non-Native American in the production render an item violative of the statute?" he asked in court documents.