Hamish Hume, greatest white-collar criminal after the attorney in the other case in the Lamberth's court, David Thompson, the attorney for Berkowitz that assaulted all other outstanding cases to control the narrative: Robinson, Rop, Bhatti and Collins.
They ask for a dividend on Non-Cumulative dividend stocks, when the dividend is restricted according to the Law in undercapitalized enterprises to begin with, regardless of the name of the Equity holder. Huh?
He also covers up their special borrowing right from UST in the Charter.
Fee Limitation.
The FHFA-C's Rehab power.
Etc.
I'm pretty sure that John Paulson is behind the attorney Humilhs Hume, to silence the other shareholders with an illegal Class Action.
The more Capital needs, the more stock offerings for John Paulson & Co in their assault attempt on the ownership. This is why these attorneys and their regiment of witnesses brought up to court, advocate for the 10% dividend, when it's restricted and it can't be called dividend (dividends are only paid out of distributable profit, and neither the 10% dividend nor the NWS dividend complied with this financial concept)