InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Donotunderstand

10/27/22 9:44 AM

#737590 RE: navycmdr #737587

well finally the PIK (pay with equity common stock ) VERSUS use cash is raised

and a big shot said - seriously - did not know we could?

that is insanity

Indeed the role of conservator - is in part to conserve cash - and where such cash might go low == THEY ABSOLUTELY SHOULD HAVE PAID IN STOCK

that alone seems so huge

What is this bull about we need to infuse cash (so they do not borrow to pay 10%) when F and F had zero need to pay cash
icon url

Donotunderstand

10/27/22 9:47 AM

#737593 RE: navycmdr #737587

on one point in red

HUGE ---- size of the globe - difference between a policy orientation (right or wrong) to "small the roles of F and F" in an overall MBS market

VERSUS

To wind them down

That difference IMO is so large and huge --- the two "policy "orientations" should not be in same sentence --------
icon url

Clark6290

10/27/22 9:52 AM

#737597 RE: navycmdr #737587

Ruff, ruff. Lamberth court room is the only one that matters. I have been in a family law court room, does that count? Ruff, ruff
icon url

Patswil

10/27/22 10:06 AM

#737601 RE: navycmdr #737587

So SEC green lighted this thing, meaning someone over there must have known in advance.

Layton said it was clear they were being informed of FHFA's decision to do 3rd/NWS and input was not wanted or requested. $3B reserve was questionable since volatility would lead to draws

Layton claims he didn't know about PIK option until the lawsuits started [No one read the PSPAs?] Thought growing liq. pref. would also cause problems, even though concerns were in bonds, which are senior to SPS because "it would look like FnF are in trouble"
FnFan
@FnFGateFan
·
8h
Never discussed a pay back option, and got impression that Tsy was not interested. "The Govt", meaning some combination of Tsy/FHFA/White house, viewed FnF charters as flawed, only wanted release after legislation to change it. [Don't like law so we'll break it until they change]
icon url

Patswil

10/27/22 10:11 AM

#737606 RE: navycmdr #737587

Finally, joint proposal to push closing to Monday, since trial is taking a bit longer than expected. Will depend on how many jurors will request to be excused when they find out. We should have a final answer Thursday
icon url

skeptic7

10/27/22 10:24 AM

#737611 RE: navycmdr #737587

If this was a fight, the ref would have stopped it.
icon url

Ace Trader

10/27/22 12:14 PM

#737644 RE: navycmdr #737587

Seems Gov wants to close this down and keep damages to the Government at a minimum!! The longer the trial goes on the more damages and possible larger damages payout