I didn't even know of the discrepancy of 41 vs 53.
of course, I don't trust the SEC or the OTC or the OTCM, because they update as slowly or as quickly as required to manipulate stocks including zombies like UBQU.
my comment was about there being 53 retail holders of UBQu. sounds low, and 41 even lower, but IF true it helps prove MY theory that retailers might hold at best 7B of this stock.
in my previous posts, I pointed out that whether retailers hold a tiny percentage and algorithms might move us up for their reasons, or we have retailers who are hibernating holding massively large positions of UBQU and knew now is not the time to panic, this data if true wouldn't surprise me, nor would it cause me to be concerned at this point.