InvestorsHub Logo

DJ Ponder

10/12/22 5:17 PM

#97934 RE: VeronicaFox #97871

Its just a dumb, out of touch, non PC sexist reference to this POS fraud atmh.

Who the HEL* Is “SHE”??? I cannot believe in todays climate, traders are Sexualizing a STOCK that obviously shouldn’t be. It’s sickening to claim ATMH is a “she” or “her”.

You’d think IR would get it, but it appears they’re clueless, not surprising at all since they report $99 cash. LOL… no one wants their name associated with this EMBARRASSING P&D FAILURE of a company run by a family.


Clueless indeed.

Frayed Knot

10/14/22 1:27 PM

#98029 RE: VeronicaFox #97871

Who the HEL* Is “SHE”??? I cannot believe in todays climate, traders are Sexualizing a STOCK that obviously shouldn’t be. It’s sickening to claim ATMH is a “she” or “her”.

You’d think IR would get it, but it appears they’re clueless, not surprising at all since they report $99 cash. LOL… no one wants their name associated with this EMBARRASSING P&D FAILURE of a company run by a family.



I have asked that question in the past. Personally, I think it is just weird for a stock, any stock, to be a she/her or he/him.

Exactly correct ,stocks cannot be sexualized and I find it very weird/creep that IR would even think about doing it. VERY bad idea, in my opinion.

Most importantly....

Stocks are an IT not a gender... common sense tells me that....

especially ATMH which isn't really even a company thus to buy stock in this THING is a really bad idea.

How embarrassing for the ATMH IR group to sexualize the so called company/stock..

P&D's are really THINGS, right? Which is the BEST that can be said about ATMH or any other P&D.