Replies to post #49878 on FuelCell Energy Inc (FCEL)

[krays]

This statement is not true.
It’s the second attempt at a SureSource 4000 installation. Both projects were subject to massive delays!

This one is almost 3 years late and still dealing with delays and lack of performance.

***************
The Company is extremely proud to announce the commercial operation of this first installation of the SureSource 4000, as it is excited about the two SureSource 4000 power plants currently being developed on the U.S. Navy Subbase in Groton, CT. The U.S. Navy base project is further evidence of the mission-critical microgrid applications that FuelCell Energy power platforms support. The U.S. Navy project is anticipated to become commercially operational in 2020.

https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2020/04/21/2019259/8041/en/Triangle-Street-Project-Begins-Commercial-Operation-SureSource-4000-High-Efficiency-Fuel-Cell.html

[Twister]

Over promising and underperforming became routine!

FCE knew the requirements and accepted the completion terms.
Your attempt to place fault on the job is truly, truly bizarre.

FCE would sound like fools, unaware of the scope of the project.
They accepted the project, now continue failing to perform.

Excuses expose weakness and only serve to highlight the failure.
Prioritize the completion. Performance and credibility matter!