InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

RickNagra

10/04/22 1:59 PM

#734179 RE: BigBruce28 #734178

Holy schnitzel everyone.
icon url

nagoya1

10/04/22 2:15 PM

#734184 RE: BigBruce28 #734178

What is going on with the ROP judges....FNMA

Gibons and Crook need to have their heads reexamined.

What does has not been confirmed been misunderstood. wth.

Thapar was the only one of sound mind and body.

Onto Lamberth...

FNMA
icon url

Hvp123

10/04/22 2:34 PM

#734190 RE: BigBruce28 #734178

The Sixth Circuit ruled in the Rop case today:

(A) Acting Director DeMarco was not serving in violation of the Appointments Clause when he signed the third amendment; and

(B) the case is remanded to the district court to determine whether the unconstitutional removal restriction inflicted harm on shareholders;
icon url

Lite

10/04/22 2:45 PM

#734191 RE: BigBruce28 #734178

Yes, indeed…

“Since this is an Appointments Clause challenge, Ryder and Lucia apply. Thus, the de facto officer doctrine does not prevent the shareholders from obtaining relief..”