Hayloft: Good point and I agree. I never understood the relationship with CKYS and SQUM unless CKYS had cash on hand to pay for SQUM products upon delivery. I feel that was the reason for the relationship as SQUM being a manufacutring company needed cashflow prior to waiting 60 to 90 days if they dealt with a big name retailer.
If CKYS actually had cash on hand and I hope they do and still do then it would make sense for SQUM to resell to CKYS as CKYS being a small company would buy for products much faster than traditional retailers. SQUM needs cash to replinish inventory to ship.
However the recent suspension in trading and financials they issued has my questions in doubt about Cyberkey's ability to pay. or I feel Black and Decker offers much more credibility to Sequiam than Cyberkey ever could. If Cyberky comes clean and is legit then it is a boon for Sequaim again. However, Black and Decker BDK has greater marketing capapbilities than most understand. Black and Decker is huge! We wamt them as a patner!
My frustration was centered around the bogus posts on the CKYS board claiming they were in control of SQUM. That was completley ludicrous in my opinion which was reason I chose SQUM as an invetment over CKYS.
If the investors in CKYS thought so much about the products CKYS was[,im my investment in my opinion. were not acceptable}
Then why not can cancel the trial and go to the direct retailer in first palace.
I.E. Sequaim SQUM
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
