InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DJ Ponder

09/16/22 2:30 PM

#89263 RE: VeronicaFox #89260

Thats correct VF.
ON THIS VERY COMPANY.
Traders dont forget these things.
Like how it was stated how Listerman was l"ike a breath of fresh air "during the time period factcheckers findings were being made public that indicated otherwise about Listerman.
The very same claimant is now glowingly talking about Davis and thrashing Listerman again as factcheckers findings regarding Davis are indicating otherwise.

Unfortunately I saw more than one public PR edited.<Tsk Tsk>


Nothing like SHOWING HOW self interest drives fraudulent statements if it leads to a lousy buck.

Sad.
icon url

Frayed Knot

09/16/22 4:28 PM

#89274 RE: VeronicaFox #89260

Unfortunately I saw more than one public PR edited.<Tsk Tsk>



Indeed and how very SAD is that!!!

Why does Tiny Mickey feel the need to be such a liar? Seriously!?

And if he didn't alter the headline, who did? And wouldn't that person be sure to check with Tiny Mickey Davis FIRST before making such alternations?

I would certainly hope so. So even if Mickey didn't do the alteration himself for multiple PRs... he must've "approved" them... NOT GOOD.

Mr. Transparent, Tiny Mickey Davis, seems to not be "transparent"....

Oh yea and there is the lawsuit that was going to be BIG that was VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED in ONE week (last May)... but Mick Davis never told stuckholders about it... WHY NOT?

ANDDDD.. has Mick Davis let stuckholders know about the CONTEMPT OF COURT? Or the questions he has to answer.... or the Sanctions he has to pay?

I am sure "mr. Transparent" has let everyone know... right? LMFAO