Possibly.
The Amendment also provides for releases as to certain matters related to the Merger Agreement and the Amendment.
Possible there could have been a dispute. But if the reason for the amendment was because of a dispute, why be concerned with whether Pando remains a separate entity?
I just think something came up recently, after the last earnings call, that triggered this.
If it's a strategic alternatives opportunity, I doubt Veritone is going to say, sorry, we will have to wait 3 months to see what the final earnout will be.