Just what do you mean by saying that "MGLD's Institutional ownership list continues to grow and evolve"?
On 8/24 you posted the following link that noted that current institutional owners had 206,088 shares long of MGLD: https://fintel.io/so/us/mgld.
Now, you just posted a fresh, updated message this morning with the very same link: https://fintel.io/so/us/mgld, that also teases us with the impression of a boost in Institutional ownership, but the share total is still 206,088 shares long.
How can you have an increase in Institutional ownership if the share total they own collectively doesn't change? Do you check for these inconsistencies before you submit things like this or not?
While I'm on the subject of the beating of the drum by some about MGLD's supposed burgeoning Institutional ownership, here below are my thoughts from 8/24 about this very same issue.
My bottom line on this entire matter: We shareholders seem to have a greater level of faith in MGLD and a deeper willingness to take sizable positions in it than those who would have us believe they oversee the hefty financial means for us to be calling them "institutions" or by their referring to themselves as "funds" in the first place. Read on:
wealthy and healthy
Re: DrD post# 3316
Wednesday, August 24, 2022 7:03:40 PM Post# of 3348 It would seem to me that if institutional investors were that keen on ownership of this stock, the total amount of their holdings would be far more than just 2/3 of 1% of the shares, which is what is shown by what you included here: https://fintel.io/so/us/mgld
While all interest in us is good news, it appears that all they want to do for now is gargle with MGLD, not swallow. More than a token of commitment is required from those with deeper pockets at their disposal.