InvestorsHub Logo

justsayingnow

08/22/22 2:14 PM

#69104 RE: Wahoo98 #69103

“It will be interesting to find out if other companies are working with SFRX for access to Sea Searcher”
As of June 30 SFRX hasn’t provided the services of the SeaSearcher that someone prepaid $140,000 for over a year ago. Not sure why other companies would want to work with SFRX with that record. They “believe that it will continue to expend significant resource to further develop the SeaSearcher”
Doesn’t sound like it’s ready for the big time in my opinion.

hedge_fun

08/22/22 4:12 PM

#69108 RE: Wahoo98 #69103

If so, it does not bode well for those claiming that Sea Searcher is a fraud…….



Did the Toy proclaim it worked 1128 days ago?

I could have sworn it was someone working for the company, not the Toy itself.

I’m not sure you could claim fraud anyway. Folks working for the company may simply be overly optimistic about the Toy.

Or maybe the rocket scientists are just telling them what they want to hear……hence the optimism.

Timmy The PM said long ago it was close to being operational, whatever that means. It can mean different thIngs to different people.

As far as SFRX working for others companies, didn’t Kyle project Q1 2023?

Raider21

08/23/22 11:21 AM

#69113 RE: Wahoo98 #69103

Quote: Just to clarify, Hedge is not the one who is married to the use of a magnetometer in discovery, its Raider and me, although strictly sarcastically in my case. Can't wait to see nico's in depth analysis of this potential development.
_____________________________________

You are aware of course that nearly every major Spanish treasure shipwreck (and others); 1554 Fleet Padre Island wrecks, Mel Fisher's 1622 Atocha & Margarita, Burt Webber's 1641 Concepcion, Bob Marx's 1656 Maravilla, (and many others) were discovered using MARINE MAGNETOMETERS.

I am most perplexed as to why so many of you choose to remain in denial on the matter? Comparatively speaking, the TIMMY TOY hasn't found crap and likely never will.