InvestorsHub Logo

Nothing2c

08/16/22 11:11 AM

#32710 RE: govprs #32709

Thanks. I got the same feeling. I also don't like the fact that there was no timeline given.

Classic Warrior

08/17/22 5:46 AM

#32715 RE: govprs #32709

This may be true, so let's unblind the rest when the dosage increased. The results will be even better.

rickstereo3333

08/17/22 4:19 PM

#32719 RE: govprs #32709

Would agree totally but for the fact that literally every company, including pfizer and merck, that claimed their drug showed overwhelming efficacy in the end turned out to be complete shite when scrutinized fully.

Basically, the 210 data is, imo, insufficient to proclaim success and then later on end up with egg on ones face.

What we know now is that the data showed sufficient efficacy to approach the fda, which was the only intent for this course of action.

You could be right that the data isnt overwhelmingly positive, or, its simply that the revive team continues to be tight lipped.