InvestorsHub Logo

kgromax

08/07/22 9:33 AM

#213541 RE: JPG77 #213539

WRONG AGAIN

I did post a link from Cytodyn proving they have JUST recognized the issue with their past accounting. It is their OWN WORDS.

I welcome any LINK proving the opposite.

I have searched for that information and could not find any in Cytodyn SEC filings. They all refer to different past accounting issues. LOL

RTBhub

08/07/22 9:38 AM

#213542 RE: JPG77 #213539

This is from the most recent 10Q:
As previously disclosed in the Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2021, we identified an error that resulted in revisions to additional paid-in capital and non-cash inducement interest expense beginning in fiscal year 2018 through the three months ended August 31, 2021. The error relates to a pre-existing model used to calculate non-cash inducement interest expense designed to calculate inducement interest expense specific to modification of a warrant term (e.g., extension of the term or modification of exercise price) without settling the instrument. However, starting in fiscal year 2018 and to date, inducements have been primarily structured to be a settlement of the warrant, not a modification. We believe the failure to identify these errors on a timely basis resulted from a material weakness related to the evaluation of complex accounting issues due to staffing constraints and lack of technical expertise. In connection with the identification of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, we continue to evaluate, design and implement controls and procedures to address this weakness. In recent periods, we have entered into consulting arrangements for external resources and have hired additional personnel with accounting skills to strengthen internal control over financial reporting, specifically in the areas of technical accounting and financial reporting.

This is from the 8-k last week:
During the preparation and audit of the annual financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2022, the Company concluded that a material error was identified in how the Company was accounting for common stock issued to settle certain convertible note obligations dating back to fiscal year 2021. The Company had been accounting for these transactions in accordance with debt extinguishment accounting. However, although the contractual terms did not explicitly describe the transactions as induced conversions, the transactions should be accounted for as induced conversions rather than extinguishments of debt and are therefore subject to induced conversion accounting.

The disclosures are substantially different and cover different time periods (the first goes back to 2018, the second is only back to fiscal 2021). Conclusion: The disclosure last week was on a similar, but different, technical accounting issue, and has more significant ramifications on the financial statements. Hence the dramatic, "...no longer rely on our previous financial statements."

justdafactss

08/07/22 1:50 PM

#213553 RE: JPG77 #213539

NOPE! The 8/5/2022 8K filing says---

(a) For the reasons discussed below, on August 4, 2022, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) of the Company, after consultation with management of the Company, Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP (“MGO”), the Company’s current independent registered public accounting firm, and Warren Averett, LLC (“Warren Averett”), the Company’s former independent registered public accounting firm, determined that the Company’s previously issued consolidated audited financial statements for (1) the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, which were included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 30, 2021, and (2) the Company’s previously issued unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarters ended November 30, 2020, February 28, 2021, August 31, 2021, November 30, 2021, and February 28, 2022, will be restated and, accordingly, that the foregoing financial statements should no longer be relied upon.
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1175680/000155837022012454/cydy-20220804x8k.htm

Here, it ONLY mentions November 30, 2021 in the 4/11/2022 filing---

We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2021, which could, if not remediated, result in material misstatements in or untimely reporting of our financial results which could lead to substantial additional costs and an adverse impact on our stock price.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001175680/000155837022005291/cydy-20220228x10q.htm

Here too in the 1/10/2022 filing---

We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2021, which could, if not remediated, result in material misstatements in or untimely reporting of our financial results which could lead to substantial additional costs and an adverse impact on our stock price.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001175680/000155837022000190/cydy-20211130x10q.htm

So please tell me and all that are concerned, where exactly is November 30, 2020, February 28, 2021, August 31, 2021, and February 28, 2022 mentioned in each of the previous 10Qs?

The DD says its impossible because they dont exist.