Replies to post #82008 on Niocorp Developments Ltd (NB)

[Big-Picture]

I read this board regularly and haven't read an opinion like yours. We are all entitled to our opinions but certainly yours is one that no one else has expressed openly on this board that I can recall. Interesting for sure.

[stark12]

I think that's unlikely. If I'm not mistaken, Mark has deep personal ties with CBMM.

[NorCalTommy]

Cresus,
I definitely do not think that is the case.... CBMM is inextricably tied to our fate and will complement not cancel our output. With the exponential demand forecasted in the next years, the world is going to need many sources of critical minerals; it's an all hands on deck situation and even with multiple suppliers, there will still not be enough materials to satisfy demand for these minerals!

I too agree, no matter how we got here (and we can all voice our chronological playback asessment), i believe the key to our success lies in the outcome of the demo testing (if we can get it started). This is the 'long pole in the tent', and we are all waiting and waiting with baited breath..... Every indication looks positive, chico lays it out very well from top to bottom in an objective analysis, one can probably not read & absorb that recurring analysis summary (that he posts) without coming to the conclusion that we are on a very positive track with a very high probability of success within a short time. Combine that with the recent 'geopolitical developments', i.e., the maniacle push for alternative energy sources (even at the expense of the health of the economy), EV production number explosion, both sides of the political aisle on board for accelerated DOMESTIC sources of critical minerals/materials in light of the dominance of mineral supply by countries that do not have our best interest at heart...

Connect dots, do your own DD and put it all together and i have come to the inescapable conclusion that we are sitting in the 'CATBIRD SEAT'... MEEEOWWWW

Admittedly, I too am very critical of things sometimes, but for the most part my aim/focus is getting the facts and getting a transparent passdown on status regularly. I maintain that it is imperative that the shareholders know what the status is (within compliance guidelines of course, and there are ways for seasoned execs to keep the shareholders updated........ we need to hear the good, the bad, the ugly, the warts, the unvarnished, unadulterated truth and status. That is what i want and vocally pursue.

Looking forward to 'material news' , i.e., the start of the demo testing upon having all hardware in place.... chugga chugga chugga.... the 'Lil Engine that could'

Yaddddddda Yaddda...

NCT

[Demolition Man]

That thought terrifies me....But it also gives management another list of excuses on "Why" they cannot get this mine financed. I am a little shocked how $NIOBF has completely glossed over the face we are on our "3" feasibility study???? Most people/Investors would say why so many?? How can they not get financing for any of these studies?? Management has zero pushback from the share holders so they will just continue to make new excuses on why?? Not being negative just asking "real" questions that never seem to get answered expect "mark is the best", "this is not his marks first rodeo", "Mark started molycorp before he bankrupted the company", " mark only hires the best" yadda, yadda, yadda....Here is what I have done for $NIOCORP:
I have called numerus local and national radio and tv programs, I have emailed numerous radio and television programs, I have tried to market/advertise for $NIOCORP( TOLD THEM I WOULD DO SOME WORK FOR FREE) And what response do I get back from management? ZERO? So please tell me how much extra work others have done for this company?? I am the ultimate team player I just feel like I am being played as of late. I am curious how much extra work some of you have done to help promote this company!! Look forward to all these excellent ideas and feedback from you all...