Replies to post #728001 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

See the quote in the middle of this post I just wrote showing four Supreme Court opinions that say so.

I'll bet none of those 4 USSCT cases involved a federal government Conservator where the intent to have the federal government nationalize the entities pre CONservatorship was a discoverable event.

Take a look at the Litigation Summary in Freddie's latest 2Q22 10q and they state that the Takings Case Pleadings are asking for the federal judiciary to do a lot more than you believe will be the best case scenario for Plaintiff shareholders. Of course your mumbling to yourself that Plaintiffs always over ask in their Pleadings and the Judge will follow precedent, BUT THIS FACT PATTERN INVOLVES OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S EXECUTIVE BRANCH PRE-CONSERVATORSHIP PLANNING A NATIONALIZATION OF TWO OF THE LARGEST US FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES.

The US Supreme Court will either deny the shareholders Petition for a Writ of Certerrori, grant it, or sit on it for awhile.