Replies to post #727532 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Mnemonic]

The appointments clause violation and the unconstitutional removal restriction are two separate lawsuits. I was talking about the latter.

But concerning the appointments clause violation, I think there is a statute of limitations that was discussed during oral arguments, though it's possible it was in reference to "timely challenges" related to the De Facto Officer Doctrine. IIRC plaintiffs said they brought the suit in time, so whatever.

[Wise Man]

The Appointments clause's 210-day time limitation was upheld with regard to the NWS, because the NWS was eanbled by the Final Rule CFR1237.12, that had an effective date July 20, 2011 that was exactly the last day to comply with the Appointments clause's time limitation for an Acting Director.
The plaintiffs are corrupt. They cover up the regulation. Crime of Making False Statements.