Replies to post #322 on LITHIUM STOCKS AND CHARTS

[NanoEE]

MIT, and why not. Genius, design, on an inverse relationship between charging and depletion.

The fact that they have a battery manufactured and installed is great news. How it is performing, we will never know, NDA is tied to that.

Plus it is a company that is private, they don’t have to spit out any data on this battery what so ever.

Yeah yeah yeah, they have power point photos of their tech, but I want to see the electrical characteristics.

He meets all UL ratings which is a good thing.

Worth throwing money at when the IPO goes public. How much money is another question, it’s a game of, you show me yours and I’ll show you mine.

[NanoEE]

And now the Questions:
1. What if you let it continuously go into the solid condition, what does that do to life expectancy? What does that do to the interior plates and hardware, what is there degradation state for every solid condition? What happens to efficiency?
2. Hermetically sealed in a stainless steel box, at 750 degrees Fahrenheit. To be accountable at hermetically sealed means to have Quality Assurance above ISO standards. How long is that process for each container?
3. That is great you cover other batteries potential failures, but as we know in the energy sector there are failures at all times when the unknown is expected. What conditions have been tested? I.E., forklift running through the side of a container? Direct lighting strike at the exit/entry? Unrecoverable Solid condition?
4. I still do find it intriguing that there is only one of these LMB’s at one place and not more by now.

Many more questions will come, but I am all for this technology, just wish I had some data to back up my curiosity on the Liquid Metal Battery.

I do want to see this flourish, not just on the investment reasons, but on the sectors need to benefit from incredible technology that can excel the off grid customers.