InvestorsHub Logo

gitreal

07/22/22 5:58 PM

#78218 RE: DGJR #78217

do like I did and have a qualified mixing geologist, engineer or amining attorney look at the Geo report,

Great idea but I bet it was expensive having three experts review that report! One would have sufficed. Anyway, I bet they were not too impressed with an underground mining scenario involving 100,000 tons at 3 oz/ton Ag, and 0.5 g/ton Au. And no infrastructure. I hope they set you straight.

wii1dr

07/22/22 10:18 PM

#78231 RE: DGJR #78217

You and I will keep buying before the ship sails. GLTU!

condor1

07/22/22 10:46 PM

#78232 RE: DGJR #78217

DGJR, a qualified geologist was the person who prepared the report. Should another QG interpret what the QG stated in that report? For what purpose, to interpret the interpreta5tion of the report.
Why didn't the QG state a god gams per ton statement? Why state that the mine has AT LEAST $10 million? Why didn't the QG decide to drill holes at different locations?
Given the costs of mining, why didn't the QG state that the mine is/is not commercially viable?
What would a different QG state, who never viewed the land and drilling locations?Especially no new drill holes?
How do we, the investors, know that AABB didn't instruct the QG what to state, or more importantly, not state?