Sylvia, Google Samsung and Micron infringed on NetList seminal patent.
In Google's case it was 12 years or more. For Samsung what started out as a breach of licensing contract turned into an infringement lawsuit.
There is a great deal of evidence pointing to collusion between all three of these companies, especially between Google and Samsung.
The very LEAST all three of these companies owe NetList licensing fees. Royalties should also be considered since without NetList's seminal patent IP none of these players could have captured market share as they have. Samsung supplies Google laptops and cellular phones through Lenovo, and Samsung subsidiary.
Since the fight has persisted for over a decade with Google, and Google has become the dominant search engine platform due to NetList technology, one would think the royalties on revenue made by Google would be a good sum of money. Again, without NetList seminal patent PIP Google is just an ordinary search engine with nothing special about it. The memory and speed at which data is accessed is the key here.
Licensing should still be a pretty penny, but IMO, royalties attached to the use of NetList seminal patented IP should be substantial in comparison.
Same will go for Samsung and Micron to a lesser degree.
These Companies need to be taught a lesson. Whether it arrives at that or not is up to the courts and the law. These companies KNOWINGLY
stole this seminal patented technology from NetList and TRIED to smoke NetList into bankruptcy. NetList is alive and well. Plan failed. Now they have to pay.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
