WRONG! Can you PROVE with a FACTUAL proof that these catalysts are NOT going to occur?
Thanks for introducing the point I wanted to make: Considering Cytodyn’s history of 40+ broken promises, one can only be sceptic toward long certainties.
Being sceptic doesn’t require a proof of the opposite. It just requires to weight down one´s certainties about the future based on historical performance of past certainties we had. Which, for longs, has been really bad. Dismal in fact. 40+ « sure things » which all failed! Imploded, one by one, with the regularity of a clock.
No need for proofs of the contrary to apply scepticism. Just many, many negative feedbacks.
Is that clearer now?
Thanks for the opportunity to explain that crucial point.