InvestorsHub Logo

kgromax

07/14/22 7:15 AM

#211922 RE: JPG77 #211921

WRONG! Can you PROVE with a FACTUAL proof that these catalysts are NOT going to occur?


Thanks for introducing the point I wanted to make:
Considering Cytodyn’s history of 40+ broken promises, one can only be sceptic toward long certainties.

Being sceptic doesn’t require a proof of the opposite.
It just requires to weight down one´s certainties about the future based on historical performance of past certainties we had. Which, for longs, has been really bad. Dismal in fact. 40+ « sure things » which all failed! Imploded, one by one, with the regularity of a clock.

No need for proofs of the contrary to apply scepticism. Just many, many negative feedbacks.

Is that clearer now?

Thanks for the opportunity to explain that crucial point.