Replies to post #68547 on Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[hedge_fun]

Treasure? Why do they need treasure they claim……

they won’t sell?

It’s all about the archaeological value, right? You know, the UNESCO model Kyle says they follow.

Aren’t they already in touch with a museum about Juno and an exhibit?

Isn’t the “alleged” TV deal they had almost 2 years ago coming to fruition now?

Juno has archaeological value, doesn’t it?

The Court gave them ownership, so there you go. Bring the SFRX business model to the forefront. Let’s see it in action.

Looking forward to the big ole ballast pile exhibit and TV show.

Please note: If they ever found treasure they were allowed to recover, I bet they would sell it so fast your head would spin. It would never see the light of a museum.

BTW, have you noticed the EXPL/BWVI critics have never once condemned the selling of the Pulaski treasure? Isn’t SFRX “agin” selling treasure?

Nor did their critics commend them for loaning artifacts, including some treasure, to the Ships of The Sea Maritime Museum for as long as they want to keep them.

I call bullshit on this UNESCO model claim. It’s not feasible.

The opening for the Pulaski exhibit was standing room only. Sorry the picture quality isn’t the best.

This is a small sample. The artifacts are on display throughout the museum, and the exhibit continues until December 31st.