InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PepsiMan

06/24/22 1:16 PM

#151080 RE: Tiresias #151077

I already asked for clarification if you could post proof regarding what you have been stating in cased I missed it from one of your posts and you said:

"My facts are that. Facts. I am under no obligation to post them."

So you have never posted anything to that affect and you are under no obligation to do so.

Then you state this:

“DLM told me he does not know CK of DD Summit Group.”



I have not seen anyone post this type of language on this discussion board so it means nothing. What more is there to be said. You have stated you have information for a Judge if you are ever asked to present. My recommendation is if you have information as you allege then present the damn evidence to the FEDS by all means.
icon url

PepsiMan

06/24/22 1:26 PM

#151082 RE: Tiresias #151077

This is what I was asking about and yet is it just a statement that ones need to accept?

If someone is willing to not tell the truth about a simple relationship then one must ask what else are they willing to not tell the truth about?



I already asked for clarification previously if you could post proof regarding what you have been stating in cased I missed it from one of your posts and you said:


"My facts are that. Facts. I am under no obligation to post them."



I didn't miss anything. You have not posted anything to show what you have been saying. So I think you just clarified that previously yes?

You are under no obligation to do so. Ok. No issue there.

Then you state this:

And there are times when one was told something but they would choose to not have it confirmed as it would potentially hurt the investment. No one has ever stated that DLM TOLD THEM HE DOES NOT KNOW CK. It has been denied but obviously if one knows that it has never been said “DLM told me he does not know CK of DD Summit Group.””



I don't as I read over that statement even understand what is being said. It makes absolutely no sense. Asked for clarification. No details were provided to show some sort of proof. Matters not. Irregardless. It's pointless and leads to nowhere speculating on something like this.

What more is there to be said on that subject. You have stated you have information for a Judge if you are ever asked to present. My recommendation is if you have information as you allege then present the damn evidence to the FEDS by all means.



$TTCM

PEPSI