InvestorsHub Logo

Smilin_B

06/02/22 4:03 AM

#18769 RE: Bill_ENG #18768

I watched the interview again and one very positive thing that I picked up was that the battery cell pack used in the latest BIC testing, was the very same used battery pack from the 2019 testing, which has been used repeatedly since 2019

So... this was NOT a BRAND NEW battery pack with BRAND NEW cells.

Michery stated he simply wanted to stress test the OLD pack a SECOND TIME to keep things on a level playing field (in my opinion- squashing the falsities scribed in the Hindenburg short report)

And I think another thing that a lot of people didn't pay any attention to was when David said that the technology in their innovative solid state battery can be used in countless applications where a non liquid electrolyte or lithium battery is utilized (cell phones, laptops, tablets etc) - and that each application will be licensed by Mullin Automotive.

The sell-off in after-hours was more of a pavlovian dog experiment with amateur Traders selling for no reason outside of the fact that the interviewer sucked and did not ask the appropriate questions. I have to defend David in conducting himself very professionally and explaining the difference between conventional, lithium ion and solid-state battery technologies to the best of his ability even though it was outside of his area of expertise. He even stated that he relies on the experts and we have an entire team of those recently hired. I just don't understand how individuals could sell off the stock to that magnitude when nothing negative was stated whatsoever

howardriggin

06/02/22 5:57 AM

#18777 RE: Bill_ENG #18768

I guarantee you 10 companies are developing OTHER batteries that are better than what Muln has as we speak. Progress never stands still. If you have it get it out asap. That’s how you have a product make money. That interview was low caliber low class. CEO should have found someone more competent than that fat loser Wow Long Muln