InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Hooplahboneup

05/27/22 12:14 PM

#45042 RE: samsamsamiam #45041

George isn't an idiot.
icon url

elks

05/27/22 12:14 PM

#45043 RE: samsamsamiam #45041

No but soon The curtain will Rise.
icon url

FEARANDGREED

05/27/22 12:16 PM

#45045 RE: samsamsamiam #45041

Im am betting that if George though that Tyrus's theologies were not sound, he would not give him the time of day... The fact that George IS retweeting one of Tyrus's posts speaks volumes in my opinion.
icon url

SiriSkiBum

05/27/22 12:18 PM

#45047 RE: samsamsamiam #45041

Also why would GS legitimize Tyrus and his DD if Tyrus is wrong about wax? Surely GS is aware of this board.
icon url

Hooplahboneup

05/27/22 12:26 PM

#45055 RE: samsamsamiam #45041

Fear's post literally just says George retweeted Tyrus' tweet about ILUS.

Is the retweet a confirmation of ALL of Tyrus research? Including the GOFF CLAIM WAX is the merging candidate ?

I can already hear George if it isn’t - if you didn’t hear it from him don’t count on it!



Where are you getting this from? Just adding mayo to a nothingburger.
icon url

marcis

05/27/22 12:26 PM

#45056 RE: samsamsamiam #45041

I was just wondering about that since they are so concerned about pumping by other people
icon url

Tyrus603

05/27/22 3:42 PM

#45098 RE: samsamsamiam #45041

"That's YOUR opinion"

So basically your opinion is that George IS an idiot. OK. So noted for the record.

As to the part where you don't agree with my conclusion "for a nanosecond" that we DID receive the words and clear indication directly from George himself that GOFF is becoming the "Worldwide" Assset eXchange/WAX NFTs/Worldwide NFT, that's also been noted for the record, by everyone here.

As deeply connected as you view me to my WAX "prediction" i would remind you that you're just as firmly tied to the prediction that it is NOT the merger, and that such a claim is "ludicrous" and to the declaration that you believe George Sharp and William Quigley of WAX don't even know each other.

There is a slight guilty feeling i get in having these GOFF WAX "debates" with people, having attended as I did the nation's oldest high school, Boston Latin, alma mater of Ben Franklin et al, at which cheating -- on anything, but especially final exams, was considered a capital offense worthy of expulsion.

The guilty part is in this instance, I have been given an advance peek at the answer to the Big Question, What's the Merger?
Along with everyone else here.
And though I know this is the correct way to process the given set of facts, and recognize it, there are many who debate me on it, who seem to be unarmed with, and unwilling to acknowledge, the same cheat sheet which they have also been gifted.
Hence, not a fair fight.
So out of said fairness, I share and share.

It's also my self therapeutic method of passing the lengthy wait for the merger.

So here it is again. Not nearly all of it, but the key basics:

George Sharp values his non duplicitous reputation to the Nth degree. George recently reposted an edited Blue Ape tweet with an apology for the redo saying he wished to avoid the slightest appearance of "trademark infringement."
Rewind now to January, when George, once he learned that he is required by FINRA to have his GOFF re-name match the name of the incoming company, revealed to us that the name shall be "Worldwide NFT."

There is only ONE NFT company in the whole wide world that checks all the Wordl boxes of:
Being named "Worldwide,"
Having that rare once in a lifetime libertarian longtime VC investor who is so anti-sharing of HIS truly de fi company WAX with any OTHER venture capitalists that he has refused all private investment possibilities since the WAXP token launch five years ago with the mindset to go public into a shell as his late cofounder Malcolm CasSelle did with PCCW and as his WAXP token sponsor Mike Novogratz did with NY based Galaxy Digital into a Canadian shell.
Quigley's company is also the only NFT company in the wide world named "Worldwide" that is worthy of forward splitting 178 million outstanding shares upon the reverse merger with GOFF, because WAX is a multi-billion dollar company and nobody likes tossing around $30 shares, not enough liquidity in that.


So yes I was already given the answer i was looking for (and hoping for) from George, and so were you all, because if this merger was NOT the Worldwide Asset eXchange George would not have gone near that word with a 50-mile blockchain.
Why? Trademark infringement. Plus accusations of duplicity for choosing "Worldwide." Not how George Sharp operates.

The "hasn't happened YET so it will never happen" thesis is not based in logic but impatience.

The "can't happen because its never happened" thesis is as old as humanity. I cited the Wright brothers story on this count recently, but the Larry David FTX Superbowl commercial was a much more fun and hilarious illustration of it.

Trying to hang the HUMBL company's failure around George's neck ... if I "merge" you into a new house or a new car, as the car dealer or real estate agent, and you trash it, that's on ME?
From the custodianship standpoint, TSNP was a huge success. a Grand Slam for TSNP investors.
Now a year and a half after TSNP George has three tickers/ mergers in the works here with GOFF plus the other two all included.
In my baseball world, going three-for-four with three grand slams is the stuff of Hall of Fame performance.
You can buy a ticket and get in the Sharp merger game. Or not.
But you can't say I didn't share. Fair and square.