Replies to post #237713 on Winning Brands Corporation (WNBD)

[teddibear]

I am not altering my opinion that these alleged documents may or may not be genuine, however somewhere in the body of the so-called findings I believe it was stated that CEO Eric LEHNER REQUESTED a trial while the plaintiff did not. In my opinion this speaks volumes about who should be denigrated.
It is my opinion that the FULL story should come out and not just cherry-picked bits.
It is my opinion that omissions like this bring the allegations into disrepute and should not be assigned one iota of verisimilitude.
It is my opinion that the alleged documents do not qualify as DD in any sense of the phrase.
And in summation I maintain an opinion that copy/paste is a much better way to communicate information as it usually avoids blatant spelling errors which in themselves can inadvertently miss lead(sic) one to an erroneous conclusion.

[Cascobay]

The CEO defrauded a WNBD shareholder and was found liable for it in a court of law. This has everything to do with this CEO's integrity and absolutely nothing to do with Covid 19. Winning Brands was in the thick of a pandemic and could only manage a $400,000 year? Every other manufacturer of cleaning products couldn’t make it fast enough to fill orders.

I’m an easy-going guy and wanted to help Eric out several years ago only to get burned. I’m glad the Pearlman v Lehner case has had some disinfectant injected in it by members of this board.

Some just want to deny it – I happen to believe it because he has yet to repay me!