InvestorsHub Logo

DrHarleyboy

05/23/22 3:45 PM

#237604 RE: teddibear #237603

Why the need to "clarify" every single opinion? I don't see anyone else's opinion needing constant clarification. The opinions seem quite well thought out and thoroughly substantiated with filings and factual evidence, unlike Eric who just spews random gobbledygook without providing the entire truth of the matter at hand.

There is no need to clarify any opinion, just read it and move on.

satter

05/23/22 4:21 PM

#237611 RE: teddibear #237603

It is a case of 'clarifying' opinions to the satisfaction of the questioner.




This I can't really agree with that because I doubt there is little chance of satisfying the questioner of your negative opinion on WB or Eric or the Acquisition. So to what degree does one have to go to, in this "clarifying" to the satisfaction of the questioner when they likely won't be satisfied no matter what.


And why focus on opinions on WB and or Eric. There were a ton of opinions and how the stock was going to the moon and back with the vesting order approval, just like there was with the identifying of the tech name. Once I made an opinion comment to a member, that maybe you should not get your expectations so high. The "clarifying" to the satisfaction of the questioner was to mind my own business. I did and did not make one more comment after, yet my opinion comment was made with good intentions not to expect the moon, only because we saw it did not happen before with the announcement of GestureTek. It can be pretty disheartening to expect big things only to find it does happen.