"I do agree with you that just because professionals say charts are inaccurate for penny stocks doesn't make it so." When did I ever express this? I do not disagree, but I don't think I ever said this or something similar.
"I am not saying that your interpretation of the chart is wrong." This presumably refers to my characterization of the chart channeling during the period March 29 through May 9. Yet, on 4/4 you said, "The bleed continues." On 4/21 you said, "And the bleed down continues." I'm not researching all your posts during the time which you want to call "cherry picking." I'm pretty sure there are other instances of your claiming a bleed down. This is the only time of relevance here. You can't say the chart shows a stable trading pattern of a channel (you don't disagree) and say it continues to bleed down during the same period. It is almost humorous to have to explain your position here to you. This is not to say there cannot be downward trading channels, but this is not what the chart during this time period reveals.
Here is my post from May 12th: "On March 11 we closed at .013. On March 24th we closed at .036. Today we closed at .031. Your continued statements about a bleed down are not supported by the chart. We've bounced around and yes currently we are down from a few days ago. We have not exsanguinated; although, that is still quite possible. Your continued statements about "as predicted" are simply not supported by the data."
With no rudeness intended, I feel as though I have explained and reexplained my position. I'm going to ask you to reread my initial post that started this discussion. If you disagree with my original post, that is fine. I don't think I have much further to add to the discussion to clarify my position.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
