Apparently my point went over you head. The only people capable of a rigorous analysis are people with extensive training and experience with vaccines. Such people can perhaps do a comparison of 20 or more vaccines as some kind of frame of reference. The views of lawyers and citizens untrained in both science and virology is irrelevant. The same goes for doctors as that encompasses a wide range of disciplines. The idea that these untrained people know better than the FDA is the height of hubris and ignorance. Should we ask this group their views on climate change, quantum physics and the best way to throw a curve ball for strikes too?