as far as Melbourne is concerned. If the treasure is 5 miles from the ballast pile at Juno, as has been suggested, Spain likely would still make a claim to the (ahem) $15B.
Listen to SFRX’s CEO make the most bizarre legal claim about Spanish vessels being abandoned starting around the 8:45 mark. They’ve gone from.....it’s not a military craft to we can’t ID the wreck so how can Spain?
Folks at the Bureau aren’t aware of whatever Supreme Court ruling Kyle is talking about in the paid promo. Shareholders might want to email and ask as I did a few days ago.
Date: Apr 27, 2022, 3:52 PM
My question is, if someone located a vessel within Florida state waters that was known to be transporting property of the Kingdom of Spain when it sank, would that be considered a non-permitable site under the statute or otherwise without the consent of the Kingdom of Spain?
In other words, would a permit be issued to salvage a Spanish galleon without the permission of the Kingdom of Spain?
I got a response the next morning.
Date: Apr 28, 2022, 9:09 AM
This is a question we get often by the public, especially those who are seeking Archaeological permits in state waters. We are unable to provide permits that would allow disturbance to or recovery of artifacts or vessels protected under the Sunken Military Craft Act.
You are right in that the Kingdom of Spain claimed their vessels in foreign waters that were sailing under the authority of the king. A person wishing to disturb a Spanish vessel or recover anything from it would need permission from Spain.
Dr. Parson’s doesn’t cite a Supreme Court ruling when discussing Spanish vessels with Kyle and Timmy the PM, but state and federal laws.
This is gonna be a real fun summer. Maybe we can’t further discuss the “current boat situation,” as well as blowers.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
