Pillsworth stated that he used a email from Schaefer to verify the Bitcoin which is hilarious and certainly not Gap compliant - and any expert knows how easy it is to very ownership of Bitcoin and Pillsworth didn't verify anything because Schaefer appointed him the CEO just as he appointed Pulver.
"The question was if previous CEO's hadn't stated that CCTL had those bitcoins, would Pillsworth put them in filings?"
I answered the question with facts - just because you have a lack of understanding of basic accounting doesn't mean I didn't post facts.
It doesn't matter what Schaefer and Pillsworth discussed - the problem was that Pillsworth didn't verify the Bitcoin or Cash on hand.
It doesn't matter what the previous CEOs stated about owning Bitcoin Pillsworth had to verify they existed and they were in a wallet controlled by CCTL and that didn't happen - what is so difficult to understand about that.
No I am right - to include any asset on the Balance Sheet you must verify it exists and the company has control of it.
CCTL never owned any Bitcoin and they never had $700k in Cash on Hand - but Pillsworth included them on the financials and many shareholders invested because they believed that nonsense.
I told everyone the Bitcoin didn't exist. But greed made them believe Pillsworth.
Why hasn't Pillsworth filed a lawsuit against Schaefer if the Bitcoin existed and Schaefer absconded with them.
But Schaefer appointed Pillsworth as another puppet CEO.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
