Any theories about what this could mean for shareholders? I have no clue because all of the legal arguements we have had don't really discuss harm to the shareholders or the GSEs themselves.
hhmm - the counter party (the one with the power - the demand for money) could have stopped the NWS anytime with a properly sworn in Top Dog
hhmm - the DJT administration had their people in there for a long time and did nothing to change things
hhmm
but ? anyone who really can read Court language
While the dissent is in favor of the Plaintiff (us - right) --- they note "it must be plausible" and maybe in the main decision - said we never made our damages clear enough?
I'm working and don't have time to read this over. That said, I can say the street is unimpressed since the stock is only barely green by less than a penny. That says nobody thinks this is a big deal.