InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

M I A

04/14/22 1:08 AM

#717647 RE: kthomp19 #717633

I didn't say the plan was a lock.
I didn't say it was the best plan on earth.
I didn't guarantee it was going to happen.

You read what I did say.
It still stands. I believe the companies to be worth more than he stated.

Remain calm. I wont forget you and gb warning of massive dilution. I promise. I'm assuming full risk of my decision. I'll be fine. Thanks for the concern.

*Disclaimer
JMO
icon url

FOFreddie

04/14/22 9:44 AM

#717670 RE: kthomp19 #717633

Hi Kthomp
Bryndon Fisher and Bruce Reid are All American Patriots! They spent time and treasure in an effort to uphold the rule of law and protect shareholders who risked their investments in our market based system.

Some questions:

1. Aren't you being hypocritical admonishing Mr. Fisher - he had a legal theory and brought several law suits - isnt this exactly what your tag line is?

2. Aren't you being premature to make the determination that the takings claims are dead - isnt there still a possibility of an En Banc and Cert?

3. Didnt the DC Circuit rely on the 5th Circuit regarding whether or not there were retroactive damages for the separation of powers claim? Why dont you think the DC Circuit considered the Trump letter in their opinion?

4. Has the 5th Circuit determined the issue of retroactive damages on the Collins Remand? Isnt there still the All American v CFPB and the Collins Remand to the District Court outstanding?

5. Do you think there is a possibility that the 5th will rule for the shareholders and grant retroactive relief for the separation of powers which will result in a split between the 5th and DC Circuit ?

6. Isnt the retroactive damages cause of action being considered now in the Bhatti case at the District Court level

7. Doesnt the Rop Case also have a separation of powers retroactive damages claim that needs to be resolved?

8. Are you really saying that the common will get 10 cents or are you just assuming Glen really believes that will be so?
icon url

FNM500K

04/14/22 12:06 PM

#717698 RE: kthomp19 #717633

Also note that if you change $175/150 (for Fannie/Freddie) per share to something like $7/5 (while adjusting the share counts accordingly), the plan works just as well.

On top of that if we add Glen's cramdown of a 100 to 1 split, we're looking at probably $0.07...so not too far from his $0.10 predictions.

We're getting pretty close with these scenarios. Thanks!
icon url

trunkmonk

04/14/22 1:58 PM

#717712 RE: kthomp19 #717633

I forgot I can’t see these posts. Baloney still here, I thought it spoiled.