This is dated 4-29-20 I agree Fauci is a very bad actor but as we all know newer studies have shot Remdesivir down. If Fauci came out tomorrow touting Rem then he should be shot.
This is dated 4-29-20 I agree Fauci is a very bad actor but as we all know newer studies have shot Remdesivir down. If Fauci came out tomorrow touting Rem then he should be shot.
It’s not public what Dr. Fauci’s salary was last year or this year. (The latest published salary is from FY2020.)
It’s not public what stocks and bonds Dr. Fauci bought and sold in 2020 or 2021, as he influenced Covid policies.
It’s not public what Fauci received – or didn’t receive – in royalties. (There are up to 1,000 current and former NIH scientists receiving royalties.) Each payment could be a potential conflict of interest.
Yes, all this information resides with the National Institutes of Health (NIH), but isn’t “public knowledge,” despite Dr. Fauci’s claims otherwise in his sworn U.S. Senate testimony yesterday.
These facts are known because an organization I lead, OpenTheBooks.com, is suing NIH for production of those records. In fact, NIH admits it holds approximately 1,200 pages relating to Fauci’s financial information and conflict of interest disclosures.
Transparency advocates say that NIH should post these documents online immediately.
What’s happening in California is of special concern. It is true that cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles no longer require people to show a vaccine card to get into restaurants, bars, and gyms. But while Californians were at the bar sipping their Sierra Nevada brews and watching Golden State Warriors basketball, the state legislature was busy drafting some of the most draconian vaccine mandates in the country. If these bills become law in the next few weeks, this would set a bad precedent for the rest of the nation.
For example, AB 1993 if passed will mandate that everyone who works in the state — whether as an independent contractor working from home or as an employee at the office — must show proof of COVID vaccination. The State will have the power to determine how many additional booster shots means “fully vaccinated” at any given time, and employers who fail to enforce the mandate will face stiff fines. (Under pressure the authors tabled the bill this week but it’s not dead.) Another of the bills, SB 866 will allow children as young as 12 to be vaccinated without their parent’s knowledge or consent. Senate Bill 871 would mandate that all children in California receive COVID vaccines to attend public or private school, starting from preschool. (Never mind that there is currently not even an EUA COVID vaccine for children under 5 years old, and no approved and licensed COVID vaccine is available for any age person in this country.)