Your statement is false and comes from an incorrect focal point. The original remark was about ARknet and the Tweets to Musk as well as a belief that the funeral convention had no bearing on the PPS spike. Included in that was the diddy about Twitter. So?
The statement was not of my origin and was corrected correctly to indicate that its speculative what Musk will in the final analysis do because it is.
What does the "evidence" you "not we" supposedly shows regarding this matter? Not a damn thing.
So then your point considering this conversation started from a different poster here?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
