Replies to post #44415 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[F6]

rooster -- there is NO epistemological or ontological resemblance or parallel whatsoever, let alone any hint of epistemological or ontological equivalence, between court verdicts on the one hand, and knowledge acquired, i.e. for all practical purposes truths proven, through the scientific method on the other

so where did you find this glib little nugget of nonsensical crap? -- at the back end of a rabbit? -- it's clearly not something you composed -- . . .

or are you now too afraid to reveal your sources since I caved in your skull with my counterpunch re Tim Ball ( http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=16807573 )?

[fuagf]

Before you said there was no proof now you switch to

"Proof does not equal truth."

so you have accepted proof does exist or you are simply using
that stupid tactic of changing the subject.

Did notice that you didn't answer any one my questions and
question phobia is a common problem of most of your crowd; by
that I mean pro this stupid war, whatever and and anti the
concern about global warming.

I had written the above before reading your last paragraph and
was going to deal with it anyway, but again .. sorry .. you
might as well tell me the sun is shining outside, as it is .. a beautiful, cloudless day ..

I know how science works and that's why I admire it as a way of thinking and as a more productive and valuable contributor to evolution in comparison with the head in the sand mentality of those who get stuck with a steadfast, not to be questioned position on anything whether it be political, religious or how to play checkers. You don't HAVE TO JUMP yes, for the thousandth time, YOU DO HAVE TO JUMP IF YOU CAN. (neighbor and I) Finally he accepted my view, which, in that case, was the correct one. I knew it, but do you think he would bloody even consider it? Nope, because he had always thought you didn't have to jump. I know that Jesus did not walk on liquid water and I know that words don't come from the sky. I know this war was a fraud from the start and as a contribution to the development of democracy, in the area and to a more just, fair and peaceful world as an evolutionary step it was a mammoth one backwards. I know that all those who perpetrated it are liars.

sorry, drifted to a thought on hap there and have deleted it.

Of "truth", what is yours on, say 1. the war and on 2. my position that if we contribute to global warming in a harmful way then we should do what we can about minimizing that contribution.

If you have to obfuscate .. don't answer.