InvestorsHub Logo

Candle

03/26/22 3:52 PM

#3546 RE: prosledder #3545

Who knows, but I really think they want the share price much higher than what it is before they dilute any shares. The whole idea is to capitalize on the value of what he’s already built. I don’t get the feeling he’s a sleaze ball, just wants to grow his already great business. I’m planning on the share price being much higher before May 15. We shall see.

BeamMeUpScotty

03/26/22 5:35 PM

#3547 RE: prosledder #3545

With this float and the revenues that they already seem to be generating as a nation wide company that’s SEC filing already I think various scenarios can play out here.

Below are just my own meanderings and thoughts on the possibilities here.

Most CEO’s build something big and do so through a lot of hard work, determination, networking and frankly blood sweat and tears!

So they’re getting on a bit but want to realise the value of the company that they’ve built from the ground up.

Question is how to do it? They’ve seen the market value of companies in the same space soar and get taken over at a premium even to that value.

So they go for a public listing. The question is, how to do it to maximize shareholder value without wiping out the entire year’s profits?

The answer - a reverse merger as an already profitable company, a going concern. As it’s a going concern they don’t need any offering underwritten as they will already have had a strong team of Advisers who they’ve used on the way as they’ve built up the company.

So as everyone here knows (and this newbie to the board can tell by the content of the posts here) the cheapest way to uplist to the Nasdaq is to reverse into a SEC reporting company with a favorable share structure. This company ticks all the boxes above.

Why do I think all of this? Because when I saw the CEO’s picture, the first thing that went through my head is that this is his retirement package.

He may keep running the company for some years yet but I think that’s his ultimate goal.

Other thoughts.

He can use his company to merge with other privately held security companies.

This one can get taken over for a huge sum and pay shareholders of record a significant special dividend which might even allow investors to still hold their shares which gives us the possibility of something else of significant value being reversed in. I heard of that same thing on another tiny float OTC but SRC reporting shell a few years ago.

Even if it costs as much as $2m to complete this merger (my figures not anything I’ve seen anywhere) it’s still several times cheaper than going for a new listing from scratch on Nasdaq. For those to be approved the Nasdaq listings team will complete all kinds of due diligence, background checks etc etc etc before they give a final listing date. That can take anywhere from 18 months to 2 years!

Let’s remember that the fact that they’re fully SEC reporting which does allows for immediate uplist saving several million Dollars.

The biggest thing is that they’re running a very successful nationwide security company which is well established in all three areas of security. That’s the security of buildings, of uniformed security that you would see in the reception of a building or in a store like Macys and then personal security as well - think Kevin Costner in The Bodyguard! Lol

Establishing a personal security company is not easy. You have to select the staff very carefully.

They actively recruit Veterans into these roles and specifically state that former Vets should get in touch on their website.

These are all my thoughts as to how this could play out and whether the company is positioned to take advantage of further opportunities in all these areas.

As personal wealth is increasing I believe that the demand for the company’s services is increasing quite possibly faster than they can meet demand.

People want their private housing estates protected by their own security teams, the rich want personal protection (they offer armed and unarmed private security) and are willing to take that as the cost of being rich and I’m presuming that it can be a tax write off.

Companies want a security team that they know is up to the job. Who would you rather protects your company? Someone just recruited or someone who’s an army combat trained veteran who’s seen open combat and maybe killed a few people along the way!

I know who I’d hire of the two types!

Sorry these are just my thoughts but this is why I’m glad to be here.

I think we’ll all be very happy very soon!