InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PepsiMan

03/22/22 11:03 AM

#148774 RE: Tiresias #148768

Yet a poster referenced that he has done a demonstration showing that it does work. Where should the straight up reply come from? I would say the inventor NOT a discussion board.

Has Nugent ever claimed that it didn't work? I don't think so.


$TTCM


PEPSI
icon url

Nugentconartist

03/22/22 7:18 PM

#148796 RE: Tiresias #148768

It is a basically an approximate stepper motor design with LARGE electromagnets on top of each cylinder requiring 48V 6.5A ea to operate a mechanical magnetic interrupter between the fixed Neodymium magnets in the cylinder heads & the Neodymium magnets on the pistons. Obviously VERY inefficient as an electric motor, which is why most electric motors are a rotary design. The speed range is small, the vibration harmonics awful, the power output is like shite & it ALWAYS requires a power source of 48V 40A to operate the coils at a 15% duty cycle. This I have seen sorta working, it made me laugh.

This is then supposed to drive an alternator which then provides power to the charge the bank of batteries that operate the coils AKA "PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE".
This never worked as the motor efficiency of converting electrical power to mechanical power was very inefficient due to relying on a push-pull piston cycle as opposed to rotary.

The POWER of magnets LOLOLOL. Lots of electrical motors have magnets, there is no magic or breakthrough here.
The laws that are broken here are not the ones of physics but those of the land when you try & con people.