Replies to post #44096 on Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[NoBSPls]

Dave, I agree that your analyses on political risk, 101 impact, MSFT strategy etc have been proven correct and you have earned a vindicated "Victory Lap". But, as a practical matter many, if not most, of us were already sufficiently under water by then and faced with a decision to cut losses or hope for a "Hail Mary". In my case, my entry point was .30. I only saw that PPS one more time and I took profits. But, then I could not resist the temptation to "buy the dip" to the point were I was again under water. I can only imagine those who have been here for 10-12 years have much sadder and dramatic stories to tell (White Owl). Fortunately for me it is all "fun money" and a minor portion of my portfolio. I remain "all in" hoping for a miracle Plan B. That said, is it your opinion that the MSFT case should still be pursued at this point? While the ACTVI result is not controlling, the fatal flaw in the patent (non specificity) remains and would persist at the Circuit Court level. Is our only life line a favorable SCOTUS repair of Alice and 101? Appreciate your input.

[DataStream]

Well guess what, Microsoft filed an IPR that was allowed, which would have been another $1mil and 1 year of a rerun.
No thanks!