InvestorsHub Logo

gimmegimmeminemine

03/11/22 2:18 PM

#236506 RE: faithabides #236504

If you look back, I believe 10x was thrown out .. I think that is revised upwards now to 20x to 50x



Has it been revised upwards or has the starting size changed?

If only we knew what 10x 20x or 50x really meant.

Without a base value its meaningless. Heance the results to the share price over the last PR.

Until kim stops with the word games and actually produces significant quantities his cleverly worded PR's carry no weight with the investing public at large.

He burnt his credibility bridge long ago.

rayovac812

03/11/22 11:15 PM

#236531 RE: faithabides #236504

If you look back, I believe 10x was thrown out .. I think that is revised upwards now to 20x to 50x.



Correct. It definitely has been, but was Ben's statement of 1000 pds considering the old 10X number or was it based on the new estimate of 20-50X ???? That is what enables us to determine the starting point in kilo's.

It is also possible that "increase our output by at least ten times" was Kim learning to under promise and over deliver. Which could mean 20X was always the minimum number to consider. Hopefully the maximum number is reached or exceeded, but at this point I deal with minimums. So according to the 1000lb goal sometime in the 1st Q...thats 453 kilos.

It is also possible they bought 3 machines for 3 separate lines/strains. Which would mean over all combined metric ton production. This would be some serious under promising.

453 kg/10 = 45 kg production/month starting point.
453 kg/20 = 22.65 kg production/month starting point. Both are very low and unworthy of being revealed. If Ben under estimated, then this math is all bunk. We wait for clarification.