There's only one way I can take that. Apparently, neither you nor any in "the group" has any, even half solid, evidence of any kind, to back up the statement made that for sure, rk was not paid back all the money he loaned vplm. So there's no point in even saying he was owed, if it's NO MORE than your guess...
It's pretty established that he did indeed loan lots of money to vplm to make it all happen & I know for a fact that vplm paid at least some of that back, with shares (and possibly some cash?) because I saw it with my own eyes clearly noted in some of the filings of the time. But I don't know the total of what he loaned or the total of what he was paid back. Afaic, I don't see how anybody can say that rk ripped off shares (or tried to) from vplm or is still owed loan payback. And yet ppl here have for years been giving their opinions on that matter, usually against RK, as tho they know what they're talking about. Well, as far as I know, it's not been decided in court. If I'm incorrect & it has been decided, then kindly point me to said decision. If not, then why has it not been?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
