Replies to post #712110 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[kthomp19]

The whole point of my post, which is hard to convey over the internet the tone in which I take, is that time and circumstance matter. I simply pointed out the flaws in the argument of trump had 2 chaotic, "fair election", 2nd impeachment, pandemic, vaccine producing years to wrap this whole mess up and could have done with plenty of time to spare. If he wanted to. But, since he didn't, he didn't want to.

Yeah, it looked like you were listing the government's most recent arguments in the Collins case. My point-by-point response was not meant personally, I merely rebutted the arguments.

Those points of mine weren't meant to be an actual argument. I know there are steps in the process that are taken in specific order for good reason. Differing admins and policy objectives with those admins, changes circumstances.

Good to hear.

Those who agreed with those arguments should be quite embarrassed, then.

Everything I typed was to make a point and none of it was irrelevant, wrong, or false.

Clearly I disagree here, and more importantly, so does David Thompson (in regards to #2/3/4/6). In the Fifth Circuit's oral arguments he pushed back against many government arguments of the form "if X was ever going to happen it would have happened by now", and those formed the bulk of your list.