InvestorsHub Logo

Learning53

02/19/22 11:49 PM

#204106 RE: Learning53 #204105

"...even if they participated indirectly,..." one of my favorite parts of the article.

Spreading false rumors over and over, like negative stuff about CytoDyn and Leronlimab? And repetition of those false rumors, must count for something. Hard to imagine that happening here...LOL

(the above part of the quote is found in the sentence below)


"A racketeering case could allow prosecutors to ensnare a broad swathe of investors involved in an alleged "criminal enterprise," even if they participated indirectly, lawyers said."

Here's another interesting quote:

"While prosecutors haven't made any decisions yet, potential charges under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) were an option on the table, the sources said."

BIG NET, RICO, those directly INVOLVED OR PARTICIPATED INDIRECTLY, WOW! could be a "hot time in the old town tonight!"

A lot of encouraging information makes it worth reading the article.

Also notice the short volume is tuned WAY DOWN.

Wonder how to send a comment or two to the federal prosecutors in DC? I bet there's quite a few here that would like to help the Feds "aim the microscope."

Anybody have an address or email to post?

IMO